Why quote a remark out of its context twist network addiction standard

Why quote a remark out of its context, twist network addiction standard
First our country " network become the intersection of addiction and clinical diagnostic standard " prove through the expert, ", have disputed to this standard on the network, newspaper. What everybody said most is that there is one that " surfs the Net in " standard " for over 6 hours every day, exceed 3 months continuously to get network into the addiction " ,And define network addiction " Spiritual disease " . If an article of Guangzhou Daily says on November 24: " use for network reaching or over 6 hours continuously every day " It is the working normality of white collar, diagnose how many insane asylums should be put on to hold the mental patient of network addiction on the earth of China with this standard? Obviously, said " uses for network reaching or over 6 hours continuously every day " in " standard " ,Duration not meaning working normally. But in the face of censure of public opinion, " the standard " make person in charge, the intersection of Beijing and the intersection of Military Area Command and general hospital, become director, medical center of addiction, has to be explained as teaching pupils while being happy and carefree: "Out of work, study purpose, surf the Net over 6 o'clock every day, this it is network that become one time standard of addiction. If stay for 10 hours on the net every day for the work, cannot be regarded as network into the addiction like this. " Until the intersection of public opinion and environment, relatively loosely, especially the development at full speed of the network, we like querying more and more, including to the government, to officers, and the query to the expert. It is democratic, transparent, just that the habit of this kind of query has advanced the society greatly, this is undoubtedly enormous progress of the society. However, the habit of this kind of query, it seems that it is a bit too drastic to begin, a bit irritable, some misplace, even develop into a kind of public opinion violence. A lot of critics twist consciously or unconsciously " Use for network reaching or over 6 hours continuously every day " Meaning,and " the standard " is it listed network addiction every one in seven requirement, distort for abundant terms that network addiction diagnose, such and such to " the standard " quote a remark out of its context, and then carry on criticism, jeer at, condemn, exactly embody a kind of public opinion violence to it and researcher, also lack the due scientific attitude. It is not perhaps too perfect to try science best that " the network becomes the clinical diagnostic standard of addiction ", but, scientific to advance in exploring constantly, revising constantly itself. What made people worried even more is, unexpectedly still regard making money as the persons who ingore science of starting point. To in the critic of " standard ", someone criticizes the motive that " standard " issues is for monopolizing " cause of disease " of network addiction treatment . I am unable to judge whether such criticism is true, but no matter who he is, if the true tool that criticizes with the public opinion carries on the game of the interests, that is really scientific grief. Annual soldier Liu of Hunan

|